EBA Regulation Art. 29 and ESMA Regulation Art. 29 where the texts differ

textually similar (0.912) · paired on the EBA Regulation text of 31 December 2025 and the ESMA Regulation text of 10 November 2025 · headings the same

EBA Regulation Art. 29 and ESMA Regulation Art. 29 are textually similar: their words match at a ratio of 0.912, where 1 is identical text. That says nothing about what either provision requires, or whether one should change because the other did.

EBA Regulation Art. 29 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · ESMA Regulation Art. 29 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · EBA Regulation Art. 29: its history · ESMA Regulation Art. 29: its history

Where the texts differ

These two provisions differ too widely to excerpt here; read both on EUR-Lex.

Aligned sub-provisions

EBA Regulation first, then ESMA Regulation, each with its word ratio.

• Art. 29(1) and Art. 29(1) · 0.994
• Art. 29(1)(1) and Art. 29(1)(1) · 0.994
• Art. 29(1)(1)(a) and Art. 29(1)(1)(a) · 1.000
• Art. 29(1)(1)(aa) and Art. 29(1)(1)(aa) · 1.000
• Art. 29(1)(1)(ab) and Art. 29(1)(1)(ab) · 1.000
• Art. 29(1)(1)(b) and Art. 29(1)(1)(b) · 1.000
• Art. 29(1)(1)(c) and Art. 29(1)(1)(c) · 1.000
• Art. 29(1)(1)(d) and Art. 29(1)(1)(d) · 0.986
• Art. 29(1)(1)(d)(i) and Art. 29(1)(1)(d)(i) · 0.944
• Art. 29(1)(1)(d)(ii) and Art. 29(1)(1)(d)(ii) · 1.000
• Art. 29(1)(1)(d)(iii) and Art. 29(1)(1)(d)(iii) · 1.000
• Art. 29(1)(1)(e) and Art. 29(1)(1)(e) · 0.984
• Art. 29(1)(1)(f) and Art. 29(1)(1)(f) · 1.000

Changes since the texts were paired

The record holds no change to either provision after the versions they were paired on.