emendrixAccount

Provision history · Benchmarks Regulation

Art. 21 · Mandatory administration of a critical benchmark

Benchmarks Regulation · 32016R1011 · every version of this act · on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

2 changes recorded across 2 versions, newest first.

Follow this provision (Atom) · Watch it from CI · Watch this provision

Version in force , Modified +580 −81

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2175 32019R2175 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: not readable (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date) why

dates added to the text: 2020-10-01

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

Paragraph 2(1)(a) removes the qualifier limiting notification to the college established under Article 46 to cases 'where applicable', and point (b) now ties the four-week deadline to the receipt of the assessment rather than simply stating a four-week period.

Paragraph 2's second subparagraph now bars the administrator from ceasing provision without the written consent of ESMA or the competent authority, where relevant, instead of only the competent authority's consent as before.

A new paragraph 5 is added requiring ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical standards on the criteria for the paragraph 2(b) assessment and to submit them to the Commission by 1 October 2020, with power delegated to the Commission to adopt them under Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

Cited: Art. 21, v1 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 21, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, before and after

Previous version, in force 13 February 2021 02016R1011-20210213 → this version, in force 1 January 2022 02016R1011-20220101

Article 21 Mandatory administration of a critical benchmark 1. If an administrator of a critical benchmark intends to cease providing such benchmark, the administrator shall: (a) immediately notify its competent authority; and (b) within four weeks of such notification submit an assessment of how the benchmark: (i) is to be transitioned to a new administrator; or (ii) is to be ceased to be provided, taking into account the procedure established in Article 28(1). During the period referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph, the administrator shall not cease provision of the benchmark. 2. Upon receipt of the assessment of by the administrator referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority shall: (a) inform ESMA and, where applicable, and the college established under Article 46; and (b) within four weeks, weeks following the receipt of that assessment, make its own assessment of how the benchmark is to be transitioned to a new administrator or be ceased to be provided, taking into account the procedure established in accordance with Article 28(1). During the period of time referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph, subparagraph, the administrator shall not cease the provision of the benchmark without the written consent of ESMA or the competent authority. authority, where relevant. 3. Following completion of the assessment referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2, the competent authority shall have the power to compel the administrator to continue publishing the benchmark until such time as: (a) the provision of the benchmark has been transitioned to a new administrator; (b) the benchmark can be ceased to be provided in an orderly fashion; or (c) the benchmark is no longer critical. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the period for which the competent authority may compel the administrator to continue to publish the benchmark shall not exceed 12 months. By the end of that period, the competent authority shall review its decision to compel the administrator to continue to publish the benchmark. The competent authority may, where necessary, extend that period by an appropriate period not exceeding 12 months. The maximum period of mandatory administration shall not exceed five years. 4. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, in the event that the administrator of a critical benchmark is to be wound down due to insolvency proceedings, the competent authority shall make an assessment of whether and how the critical benchmark can be transitioned to a new administrator or can cease to be provided in an orderly fashion, taking into account the procedure established in accordance with Article 28(1).5. ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the criteria on which the assessment referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2 is to be based. ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 1 October 2020. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

Version in force , Modified

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 32019R2089 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: no date changed

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

The sentence describing the competent authority's end-of-period review and possible extension has been split into two separate sentences, and the maximum total period of mandatory administration has been changed from 24 months to five years.

Cited: Art. 21, v1 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 21, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, on this version's page