Version in force , Modified +480 −66§
Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/877 32019R0877 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)
Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text
Throughout Article 20, references to writing down or converting "relevant capital instruments" are expanded to also cover "eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21", appearing in paragraphs 1, 5(a), 5(c), 5(g), 6, 13 and 15.
Paragraph 5(c) additionally changes its wording so that the decision it informs concerns the extent of cancellation, dilution, write-down or conversion of relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities, rather than only relevant capital instruments as before.
Paragraph 5(d) replaces the earlier reference to "eligible liabilities" being written down or converted with a reference to "bail-inable liabilities" being written down or converted.
Cited: Art. 20, v2 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 20, v1 (external, EUR-Lex)
v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.
Text from EUR-Lex, before and after
Previous version 32014R0806 → this version, in force 28 December 2020 02014R0806-20201228
Article 20
Valuation for the purposes of resolution
1. Before deciding on resolution action or the exercise of the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments, instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21, the Board shall ensure that a fair, prudent and realistic valuation of the assets and liabilities of an entity referred to in Article 2 is carried out by a person independent from any public authority, including the Board and the national resolution authority, and from the entity concerned.
2. Subject to paragraph 15, where all of the requirements laid down in paragraphs 1 and 4 to 9 are met, the valuation shall be considered to be definitive.
3. Where an independent valuation in accordance with paragraph 1 is not possible, the Board may carry out a provisional valuation of the assets and liabilities of the entity referred to in Article 2, in accordance with paragraph 10 of this Article.
4. The objective of the valuation shall be to assess the value of the assets and liabilities of an entity referred to in Article 2 that meets the conditions for resolution of Articles 16 and 18.
5. The purposes of the valuation shall be:
(a) to inform the determination of whether the conditions for resolution or the conditions for the write-down or conversion of capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21 are met;
(b) if the conditions for resolution are met, to inform the decision on the appropriate resolution action to be taken in respect of an entity referred to in Article 2;
(c) when the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21(7) is applied, to inform the decision on the extent of the cancellation or dilution of instruments of ownership, and the extent of the write-down or conversion of relevant capital instruments; instruments and eligible liabilities;
(d) when the bail-in tool is applied, to inform the decision on the extent of the write-down writing down or conversion of eligible bail-inable liabilities;
(e) when the bridge institution tool or asset separation tool is applied, to inform the decision on the assets, rights, liabilities or instruments of ownership to be transferred and the decision on the value of any consideration to be paid to the institution under resolution or, as the case may be, to the owners of the instruments of ownership;
(f) when the sale of business tool is applied, to inform the decision on the assets, rights, liabilities or instruments of ownership to be transferred and to inform the Board's understanding of what constitutes commercial terms for the purposes of Article 24(2)(b);
(g) in all cases, to ensure that any losses on the assets of an entity referred to in Article 2 are fully recognised at the moment the resolution tools are applied or the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21 is exercised.
6. Without prejudice to the Union State aid framework, where applicable, the valuation shall be based on prudent assumptions, including as to rates of default and severity of losses. The valuation shall not assume any potential future provision of any extraordinary public financial support, any central bank emergency liquidity assistance, or any central bank liquidity assistance provided under non-standard collateralisation, tenor and interest rate terms to an entity referred to in Article 2 from the point at which resolution action is taken or the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21 is exercised. Furthermore, the valuation shall take account of the fact that, if any resolution tool is applied:
(a) the Board may recover any reasonable expenses properly incurred from the institution under resolution, in accordance with Article 22(6);
(b) the Fund may … 633 unchanged words … and 11 shall be a valid basis for the Board to decide on resolution actions, including instructing national resolution authorities to take control of a failing institution or on the exercise of the write-down or conversion power of relevant capital instruments. instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21.
14. The Board shall establish and maintain arrangements to ensure that the assessment for the application of the bail-in tool in accordance with Article 27 and the valuation referred to in paragraphs 1 to 15 of this Article are based on information about the assets and liabilities of the institution under resolution that is as up to date and complete as is reasonably possible.
15. The valuation shall be an integral part of the decision on the application of a resolution tool or on the exercise of a resolution power or the decision on the exercise of the write-down or conversion power of capital instruments. instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 21. The valuation itself shall not be subject to a separate right of appeal but may be subject to an appeal together with the decision of the Board.
16. For the purposes of assessing whether shareholders and creditors would have received better treatment if the institution under resolution had entered into normal insolvency proceedings, the Board shall ensure that a valuation is carried out by an independent person as referred to in paragraph 1 as soon as possible after the resolution action or actions have been effected. That valuation shall be distinct from the valuation carried out under paragraphs 1 to 15.
17. The valuation referred to in paragraph 16 shall determine:
(a) the treatment that shareholders and creditors, or the relevant deposit guarantee schemes, would have received if an institution under resolution with respect to which the resolution action or actions have been effected, had entered normal insolvency proceedings at the time when the decision on the resolution action was taken;
(b) the actual treatment that shareholders and creditors have received in the resolution of an institution under resolution; and
(c) whether there is any difference between the treatment referred to in point (a) of this paragraph and the treatment referred to in point (b) of this paragraph.
18. The valuation referred to in paragraph 16 shall:
(a) assume that an institution under resolution with respect to which the resolution action or actions have been effected, would have entered normal insolvency proceedings at the time when the decision on the resolution action was taken;
(b) assume that the resolution action or actions had not been effected;
(c) disregard any provision of extraordinary public financial support to an institution under resolution.