emendrixAccount

Provision history · CRR

Art. 428h · Preferential treatment within a group or within an institutional protection scheme

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every version of this act · on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

1 change recorded across 1 version, newest first.

Follow this provision (Atom) · Watch it from CI · Watch this provision

Version in force , Inserted +2,610 −0

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 32019R2033 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2019/876 32019R0876 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2021/558 32021R0558 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2020/873 32020R0873 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: not readable (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose) why

Not in every listWhat this means

Found in the text, but not every source lists it — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. The source that does not name it is the EU's own amendment metadata. Both are shown; neither is overruled.

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

This provision is entirely new text, setting out conditions under which competent authorities may allow institutions to apply a higher available stable funding factor or a lower required stable funding factor to certain assets, liabilities and committed credit or liquidity facilities involving group or institutional-protection-scheme counterparties.

It lists the categories of qualifying counterparties, the conditions relating to funding stability, matching factors and establishment in the same Member State, and a separate paragraph allowing competent authorities to waive the same-Member-State condition where additional criteria on legally binding agreements and funding risk profiles are satisfied and where competent authorities consult each other.

Cited: Art. 428h, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex

Inserted in this version 02013R0575-20210629

Article 428h
Preferential treatment within a group or within an institutional protection scheme
1. By way of derogation from Chapters 3 and 4, where Article 428g does not apply, competent authorities may authorise institutions on a case-by-case basis to apply a higher available stable funding factor or a lower required stable funding factor to assets, liabilities and committed credit or liquidity facilities, provided that all the following conditions are met:
(a) the counterparty is one of the following:
(i) the parent or a subsidiary of the institution;
(ii) another subsidiary of the same parent;
(iii) an undertaking that is related to the institution within the meaning of Article 22(7) of Directive 2013/34/EU;
(iv) a member of the same institutional protection scheme referred to in Article 113(7) of this Regulation as the institution;
(v) the central body or an affiliated credit institution of a network or a cooperative group as referred to in Article 10 of this Regulation;
(b) there are reasons to expect that the liability or committed credit or liquidity facility received by the institution constitutes a more stable source of funding, or that the asset or committed credit or liquidity facility granted by the institution requires less stable funding over the one-year horizon of the net stable funding ratio than the same liability, asset or committed credit or liquidity facility received or granted by other counterparties;
(c) the counterparty applies a required stable funding factor that is equal to or higher than the higher available stable funding factor or applies an available stable funding factor that is equal to or lower than the lower required stable funding factor;
(d) the institution and the counterparty are established in the same Member State.
2. Where the institution and the counterparty are established in different Member States, competent authorities may waive the condition set out in point (d) of paragraph 1, provided that, in addition to the criteria set out in paragraph 1, the following criteria are met:
(a) there are legally binding agreements and commitments between group entities regarding the liability, asset or committed credit or liquidity facility;
(b) the funding provider presents a low funding risk profile;
(c) the funding risk profile of the recipient of the funding has been adequately taken into account in the liquidity risk management of the funding provider.
The competent authorities shall consult each other in accordance with point (b) of Article 20(1) to determine whether the additional criteria set out in this paragraph are met.