emendrixAccount

Provision history · CRR

Art. 325ba · Own funds requirements when using alternative internal models

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every version of this act · on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

2 changes recorded across 2 versions, newest first.

Follow this provision (Atom) · Watch it from CI · Watch this provision

Version in force , Modified +2,055 −0

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 32024R1623 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 32024R2987 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2024/2795 32024R2795 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: no date changed

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

Paragraph 1 now adds a statement that, when calculating own funds requirements for market risk under the formulas set out there, an institution shall not include its own credit spreads in the measures for positions in its own debt instruments.

Paragraph 2 now adds a derogation stating that an institution shall not be subject to the additional own funds requirement for holdings of its own debt instruments.

A new paragraph 3 has been added that sets out a formula for calculating the total own funds requirements for market risk for all trading book positions and all non-trading book positions generating foreign exchange or commodity risk, referencing the AIMA, PLAaddon, ASAnon–aima, ASAall portofolio and ASAaima components, none of which appeared in the earlier version.

Cited: Art. 325ba, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, before and after

Previous version, in force 9 July 2024 02013R0575-20240709 → this version, in force 1 January 2025 02013R0575-20250101

Article 325ba Own funds requirements when using alternative internal models 1. An institution using an alternative internal model shall calculate the own funds requirements for the portfolio of all positions assigned to the trading desks for which the institution has been granted permission as referred to in Article 325az(2) as the higher of the following: (a) the sum of the following values: (i) the institution's previous day's expected shortfall risk measure, calculated in accordance with Article 325bb (ESt-1), and (ii) the institution's previous day's stress scenario risk measure, calculated in accordance with Section 5 (SSt-1); or (b) the sum of the following values: (i) the average of the institution's daily expected shortfall risk measure, calculated in accordance with Article 325bb for each of the preceding sixty business days (ESavg), multiplied by the multiplication factor (mc); and (ii) the average of the institution's daily stress scenario risk measure, calculated in accordance with Section 5 for each of the preceding sixty business days (SSavg). Where calculating the own funds requirements for market risk using an internal model in accordance with the first subparagraph, an institution shall not include its own credit spreads in the calculation of the measures referred to in points (a) and (b) for positions in the institution’s own debt instruments. 2. Institutions holding positions in traded debt and equity instruments that are included in the scope of the internal default risk model and assigned to the trading desks referred to in paragraph 1 shall fulfil an additional own funds requirement, expressed as the higher of the following values: (a) the most recent own funds requirement for default risk, calculated in accordance with Section 3; (b) the average of the amount referred to in point (a) over the preceding 12 weeks.By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, an institution shall not be subject to the additional own funds requirement for the holdings of its own debt instruments. 3. An institution using an alternative internal model shall calculate the total own funds requirements for market risk for all trading book positions and all non-trading book positions generating foreign exchange risk or commodity risk in accordance with the following formula: where: AIMA = the sum of the own funds requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2; PLAaddon = the additional own funds requirement referred to in Article 325bg(2); ASAnon–aima = the own funds requirements for market risk as calculated under the alternative standardised approach referred to in Article 325(1), point (a), for the portfolio of trading book positions and non-trading book positions generating foreign exchange risk or commodity risk for which the institution uses the alternative standardised approach to calculate the own funds requirements for market risk; ASAall portofolio = the own funds requirements for market risk as calculated under the alternative standardised approach referred to in Article 325(1), point (a), for the portfolio of all trading book positions and all non-trading book positions generating foreign exchange risk or commodity risk; ASAaima = the own funds requirements for market risk as calculated under the alternative standardised approach referred to in Article 325(1), point (a), for the portfolio of trading book positions and non-trading book positions generating foreign exchange risk or commodity risk for which the institution uses the approach referred to in Article 325(1), point (b), to calculate the own funds requirements for market risk.

Version in force , Inserted

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/876 32019R0876 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: not readable (an inserted provision states its own application date only in prose) why

Not in every listWhat this means

Found in the text, but not every source lists it — the text comparison and the amending act's instructions found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. The source that does not name it is the EU's own amendment metadata. All are shown; none is overruled.

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

This is a newly inserted provision setting out how an institution using an alternative internal model must calculate own funds requirements for the pool of positions assigned to trading desks with the relevant permission, based on the higher of two sets of expected shortfall and stress scenario risk measure calculations.

It also adds a separate own funds requirement for institutions holding traded debt and equity positions within the scope of the internal default risk model, set at the higher of the most recent default risk requirement or its 12-week average.

Cited: Art. 325ba, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, on this version's page