emendrixAccount

Provision history · CRR

Art. 243 · Criteria for STS securitisations qualifying for differentiated capital treatment

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every version of this act · on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

3 changes recorded across 3 versions, newest first.

Follow this provision (Atom) · Watch it from CI · Watch this provision

Version in force , Modified +19 −286

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 32019R2033 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2019/876 32019R0876 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2021/558 32021R0558 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2020/873 32020R0873 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: no date changed

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

In point (b) of paragraph 1, the list of eligible protection providers for trade receivables now also includes an investment firm alongside an institution, an insurance undertaking or a reinsurance undertaking.

The sentence limiting the fully-covered and concentration-limit determination to the portion of trade receivables remaining after purchase price discount and overcollateralisation has been removed from that subparagraph.

Cited: Art. 243, v2 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 243, v1 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, before and after

Previous version, in force 28 December 2020 02013R0575-20201228 → this version, in force 28 June 2021 02013R0575-20210629

Article 243 Criteria for STS securitisations qualifying for differentiated capital treatment 1. Positions in an ABCP programme or ABCP transaction that qualify as positions in an STS securitisation shall be eligible for the treatment set out in Articles 260, 262 and 264 where the following requirements are met: (a) the underlying exposures meet, at the time of their inclusion in the ABCP programme, to the best knowledge of the originator or the original lender, the conditions for being assigned, under the Standardised Approach and taking into account any eligible credit risk mitigation, a risk weight equal to or smaller than 75 % on an individual exposure basis where the exposure is a retail exposure or 100 % for any other exposures; and (b) the aggregate exposure value of all exposures to a single obligor at ABCP programme level does not exceed 2 % of the aggregate exposure value of all exposures within the ABCP programme at the time the exposures were added to the ABCP programme. For the purposes of this calculation, loans or leases to a group of connected clients, to the best knowledge of the sponsor, shall be considered as exposures to a single obligor. In the case of trade receivables, point (b) of the first subparagraph shall not apply where the credit risk of those trade receivables is fully covered by eligible credit protection in accordance with Chapter 4, provided that in that case the protection provider is an institution, an investment firm, an insurance undertaking or a reinsurance undertaking. For the purposes of this subparagraph, only the portion of the trade receivables remaining after taking into account the effect of any purchase price discount and overcollateralisation shall be used to determine whether they are fully covered and whether the concentration limit is met. In the case of securitised residual leasing values, point (b) of the first subparagraph shall not apply where those values are not exposed to refinancing or resell risk due to a legally enforceable commitment to repurchase or refinance the exposure … 393 unchanged words … this paragraph applies, no loan in the pool of underlying exposures shall have a loan-to-value ratio higher than 100 %, at the time of inclusion in the securitisation, measured in accordance with point (d)(i) of Article 129(1) and Article 229(1).

Version in force , Modified

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2401 32017R2401 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2019/876 32019R0876 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: not readable (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date) why

dates removed: 2017-12-31

Not in every listWhat this means

Found in the text, but not every source lists it — the text comparison found this change; the EU's own amendment metadata does not list it. The source that does not name it is the EU's own amendment metadata. Both are shown; neither is overruled.

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

The article's heading and substance changed entirely: the earlier version set out rules for traditional securitisation, covering significant risk transfer, mezzanine positions, competent authority permissions, documentation conditions and clean-up call options, while the later version instead sets out criteria for ABCP and non-ABCP STS securitisation positions to qualify for the treatment in Articles 260, 262 and 264.

The earlier text's provisions on originator conditions, EBA guideline reporting and the 31 December 2017 advice deadline no longer appear, replaced by new obligor concentration limits, risk-weight thresholds for underlying exposures, and rules on trade receivables and residual leasing values.

Cited: Art. 243, v1 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 243, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, on this version's page

Version detected , Modified

no amending act named

Applies from: no date changed

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

The hyphenation of "risk weighted" was corrected to "risk-weighted" in the provisions on mezzanine securitisation positions.

The wording describing the conditions for purchases or repurchases of securitisation positions beyond contractual obligations was changed from "at arms' lengths conditions" to "at arm's length".

Cited: Art. 243, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, on this version's page