emendrixAccount

Provision history · CRR

Art. 145 · Prior experience of using IRB approaches

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every version of this act · on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

1 change recorded across 1 version, newest first.

Follow this provision (Atom) · Watch it from CI · Watch this provision

Version detected , Modified +6 −5

no amending act named

Applies from: no date changed

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

In paragraph 2 the phrase describing consistency with the requirements for use of own estimates was changed from the past tense "was broadly consistent" to the present tense "is broadly consistent".

In paragraph 3 the wording describing exposures that differ from the scope of existing coverage was changed from "significantly different to" to "significantly different from".

Cited: Art. 145, v1 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 145, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, before and after

Previous version 32013R0575 → this version, detected 13 August 2026 02013R0575-20130628

Article 145 Prior experience of using IRB approaches 1. An institution applying to use the IRB Approach shall have been using for the IRB exposure classes in question rating systems that were broadly in line with the requirements set out in Section 6 for internal risk measurement and management purposes for at least three years prior to its qualification to use the IRB Approach. 2. An institution applying for the use of own estimates of LGDs and conversion factors shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authorities that it has been estimating and employing own estimates of LGDs and conversion factors in a manner that was is broadly consistent with the requirements for use of own estimates of those parameters set out in Section 6 for at least three years prior to qualification to use own estimates of LGDs and conversion factors. 3. Where the institution extends the use of the IRB Approach subsequent to its initial permission, the experience of the institution shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of paragraphs 1 and 2 in respect of the additional exposures covered. If the use of rating systems is extended to exposures that are significantly different to from the scope of the existing coverage, such that the existing experience cannot be reasonably assumed to be sufficient to meet the requirements of these provisions in respect of the additional exposures, then the requirements of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply separately for the additional exposures.