emendrixAccount

Provision history · CRR

Art. 132 · Own funds requirements for exposures in the form of units or shares in CIUs

Capital Requirements Regulation · 32013R0575 · every version of this act · on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

2 changes recorded across 2 versions, newest first.

Follow this provision (Atom) · Watch it from CI · Watch this provision

Version in force , Modified +6,283 −2,690

Amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 32019R2033 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2019/876 32019R0876 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2021/558 32021R0558 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex) · Regulation (EU) 2020/873 32020R0873 on EUR-Lex (external, EUR-Lex)

Applies from: not readable (the text changed beyond its dates, so no date that moved can be read as the application date) why

dates removed: 2014-01-01, 2015-01-01

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

The provision's heading changes from referring to exposures in the form of units or shares in CIUs to own funds requirements for such exposures, and the substantive text is rewritten to calculate a risk-weighted exposure amount by multiplying the CIU's risk-weighted exposure amount by the percentage of units or shares held, rather than assigning a fixed 100% risk weight or a credit-assessment-based weight from a table.

The eligibility criteria for using look-through or averaging approaches are replaced with references to a look-through approach and a mandate-based approach under a new Article 132a, the fall-back approach now applies a 1250% risk weight instead of the earlier 100% default, and the list of qualifying CIU types is expanded to specifically identify UCITS and various categories of EU and non-EU AIFs and AIFMs.

New provisions are added covering reliance on third-party calculations with a 1.2 multiplier and an exception where the institution has unrestricted access to the third party's detailed calculations, treatment of multi-level CIU structures, a cap on the look-through and mandate-based amounts by the fall-back amount, and a derogation allowing use of historical cost valuation combined with a formula-based risk weight, none of which appeared in the earlier text, while the earlier provision's third-country equivalence decision mechanism and its 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2015 dates are no longer present.

Cited: Art. 132, v1 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 132, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, before and after

texts differ too much for an inline diff; shown separately

Previous version, in force 28 December 2020 02013R0575-20201228

Article 132
Exposures in the form of units or shares in CIUs
1. Exposures in the form of units or shares in CIUs shall be assigned a risk weight of 100 %, unless the institution applies the credit risk assessment method under paragraph 2, or the look-through approach in paragraph 4 or the average risk weight approach under paragraph 5 when the conditions in paragraph 3 are met.
2. Exposures in the form of units or shares in CIUs for which a credit assessment by a nominated ECAI is available shall be assigned a risk weight in accordance with Table 8 which corresponds to the credit assessment of the ECAI in accordance with Article 136.
Table 8
Credit quality step 1 2 3 4 5 6
Risk weight 20 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 150 % 150 %
3. Institutions may determine the risk weight for a CIU in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5, if the following eligibility criteria are met:
(a) the CIU is managed by a company that is subject to supervision in a Member State or, in the case of third country CIU, where the following conditions are met:
(i) the CIU is managed by a company which is subject to supervision that is considered equivalent to that laid down in Union law;
(ii) cooperation between competent authorities is sufficiently ensured;
(b) the CIU's prospectus or equivalent document includes the following:
(i) the categories of assets in which the CIU is authorised to invest;
(ii) if investment limits apply, the relative limits and the methodologies to calculate them;
(c) the business of the CIU is reported on at least an annual basis to enable an assessment to be made of the assets and liabilities, income and operations over the reporting period.
For the purposes of point (a), the Commission may adopt, by way of implementing acts, and subject to the examination procedure referred to in Article 464(2), a decision as to whether a third country applies supervisory and regulatory arrangements at least equivalent to those applied in the Union. In the absence of such a decision, until 1 January 2015, institutions may continue to apply the treatment set out in this paragraph to exposures in the form of units or shares of CIUs from third countries where the relevant competent authorities had approved the third country as eligible for that treatment before 1 January 2014.
4. Where the institution is aware of the underlying exposures of a CIU, it may look through to those underlying exposures in order to calculate an average risk weight for its exposures in the form of units or shares in the CIUs in accordance with the methods set out in this Chapter. Where an underlying exposure of the CIU is itself an exposure in the form of shares in another CIU which fulfils the criteria of paragraph 3, the institution may look through to the underlying exposures of that other CIU.
5. Where the institution is not aware of the underlying exposures of a CIU, it may calculate an average risk weight for its exposures in the form of a unit or share in the CIU in accordance with the methods set out in this Chapter subject to the assumption that the CIU first invests, to the maximum extent allowed under its mandate, in the exposure classes attracting the highest capital requirement, and then continues making investments in descending order until the maximum total investment limit is reached.
Institutions may rely on the following third parties to calculate and report, in accordance with the methods set out in paragraphs 4 and 5, a risk weight for the CIU:
(a) the depository institution or the depository financial institution of the CIU provided that the CIU exclusively invests in securities and deposits all securities at that depository institution or the financial institution;
(b) for CIUs not covered by point (a), the CIU management company, provided that the CIU management company meets the criteria set out in paragraph 3(a).
The correctness of the calculation referred to in the first subparagraph shall be confirmed by an external auditor.

this version, in force 28 June 2021 02013R0575-20210629

Article 132
Own funds requirements for exposures in the form of units or shares in CIUs
1. Institutions shall calculate the risk-weighted exposure amount for their exposures in the form of units or shares in a CIU by multiplying the risk-weighted exposure amount of the CIU's exposures, calculated in accordance with the approaches referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, with the percentage of units or shares held by those institutions.
2. Where the conditions set out in paragraph 3 of this Article are met, institutions may apply the look-through approach in accordance with Article 132a(1) or the mandate-based approach in accordance with Article 132a(2).
Subject to Article 132b(2), institutions that do not apply the look-through approach or the mandate-based approach shall assign a risk weight of 1250 % (fall-back approach) to their exposures in the form of units or shares in a CIU.
Institutions may calculate the risk-weighted exposure amount for their exposures in the form of units or shares in a CIU by using a combination of the approaches referred to in this paragraph, provided that the conditions for using those approaches are met.
3. Institutions may determine the risk-weighted exposure amount of a CIU's exposures in accordance with the approaches set out in Article 132a where all the following conditions are met:
(a) the CIU is one of the following:
(i) an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), governed by Directive 2009/65/EC;
(ii) an AIF managed by an EU AIFM registered under Article 3(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU;
(iii) an AIF managed by an EU AIFM authorised under Article 6 of Directive 2011/61/EU;
(iv) an AIF managed by a non-EU AIFM authorised under Article 37 of Directive 2011/61/EU;
(v) a non-EU AIF managed by a non-EU AIFM and marketed in accordance with Article 42 of Directive 2011/61/EU;
(vi) a non-EU AIF not marketed in the Union and managed by a non-EU AIFM established in a third country that is covered by a delegated act referred to in Article 67(6) of Directive 2011/61/EU;
(b) the CIU's prospectus or equivalent document includes the following:
(i) the categories of assets in which the CIU is authorised to invest;
(ii) where investment limits apply, the relative limits and the methodologies to calculate them;
(c) reporting by the CIU or the CIU management company to the institution complies with the following requirements:
(i) the exposures of the CIU are reported at least as frequently as those of the institution;
(ii) the granularity of the financial information is sufficient to allow the institution to calculate the CIU's risk -weighted exposure amount in accordance with the approach chosen by the institution;
(iii) where the institution applies the look-through approach, information about the underlying exposures is verified by an independent third party.
By way of derogation from point (a) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph, multilateral and bilateral development banks and other institutions that co-invest in a CIU with multilateral or bilateral development banks may determine the risk-weighted exposure amount of that CIU's exposures in accordance with the approaches set out in Article 132a, provided that the conditions set out in points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph are met and that the CIU's investment mandate limits the types of assets that the CIU can invest in to assets that promote sustainable development in developing countries.
Institutions shall notify their competent authority of the CIUs to which they apply the treatment referred to in the second subparagraph.
By way of derogation from point (c)(i) of the first subparagraph, where the institution determines the risk-weighted exposure amount of a CIU's exposures in accordance with the mandate-based approach, the reporting by the CIU or the CIU management company to the institution may be limited to the investment mandate of the CIU and any changes thereof and may be done only when the institution incurs the exposure to the CIU for the first time and when there is a change in the investment mandate of the CIU.
4. Institutions that do not have adequate data or information to calculate the risk-weighted exposure amount of a CIU's exposures in accordance with the approaches set out in Article 132a may rely on the calculations of a third party, provided that all the following conditions are met:
(a) the third party is one of the following:
(i) the depository institution or the depository financial institution of the CIU, provided that the CIU exclusively invests in securities and deposits all securities at that depository institution or depository financial institution;
(ii) for CIUs not covered by point (i) of this point, the CIU management company, provided that the company meets the condition set out in point (a) of paragraph 3;
(b) the third party carries out the calculation in accordance with the approaches set out in Article 132a(1), (2) or (3), as applicable;
(c) an external auditor has confirmed the correctness of the third party's calculation.
Institutions that rely on third-party calculations shall multiply the risk-weighted exposure amount of a CIU's exposures resulting from those calculations by a factor of 1,2.
By way of derogation from the second subparagraph, where the institution has unrestricted access to the detailed calculations carried out by the third party, the factor of 1,2 shall not apply. The institution shall provide those calculations to its competent authority upon request.
5. Where an institution applies the approaches referred to in Article 132a for the purpose of calculating the risk-weighted exposure amount of a CIU's exposures (level 1 CIU), and any of the underlying exposures of the level 1 CIU is an exposure in the form of units or shares in another CIU (level 2 CIU), the risk-weighted exposure amount of the level 2 CIU's exposures may be calculated by using any of the three approaches described in paragraph 2 of this Article. The institution may use the look-through approach to calculate the risk-weighted exposure amounts of CIUs' exposures in level 3 and any subsequent level only where it used that approach for the calculation in the preceding level. In any other scenario it shall use the fall-back approach.
6. The risk-weighted exposure amount of a CIU's exposures calculated in accordance with the look-through approach and the mandate-based approach set out in Article 132a(1) and (2) shall be capped at the risk-weighted amount of that CIU's exposures calculated in accordance with the fall-back approach.
7. By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, institutions that apply the look-through approach in accordance with Article 132a(1) may calculate the risk-weighted exposure amount for their exposures in the form of units or shares in a CIU by multiplying the exposure values of those exposures, calculated in accordance with Article 111, with the risk weight (RW*i) calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Article 132c, provided that the following conditions are met:
(a) the institutions measure the value of their holdings of units or shares in a CIU at historical cost but measure the value of the underlying assets of the CIU at fair value if they apply the look-through approach;
(b) a change in the market value of the units or shares for which institutions measure the value at historical cost changes neither the amount of own funds of those institutions nor the exposure value associated with those holdings.

Version detected , Modified

no amending act named

Applies from: no date changed

Explanation, written by a model and checked against the cited text

In paragraph 2, the phrase describing how the risk weight is assigned changed from stating it is assigned a risk weight 'according to Table 8' to stating it is assigned a risk weight 'in accordance with Table 8'.

Cited: Art. 132, v1 (external, EUR-Lex) · Art. 132, v2 (external, EUR-Lex)

v1 is the previous version, v2 this one.

Text from EUR-Lex, on this version's page